The First Amendment
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Without the First Amendment, journalism would be very limited in the content that is exposed to the general population. Although journalism does involve conveying factual information to the public, it also deals with expresses expressing opinions on controversial issues and other material, sometimes criticizing the government and other high authority figures. If the First Amendment ceased to exist, expressing one’s opinion would not be as easy as it is, if allowed at all.
As seen above, the First Amendment protects us in many ways while also allowing us to express our opinion openly, including questioning and criticizing authority whenever we want when we have to. There are some lines that should not be crossed and if done, could cause a heap of trouble for the trespasser.
For example, stating, “President Obama is a communist” when it’s not true would fall in the area of statements that should not be said. Although saying this and other false accusations may get you attention, it will also get you into trouble, and if you’re working for a respected company, termination.
Beyond making outrageous statements like this, the First Amendment protects opinions made by journalists and is very beneficial to the state of journalism.
We don't question authority "whenever we want," but when we should.
ReplyDeleteBut isn't authority always being criticized? I can't turn on the news without some kind of authority figure being harshly talked about.
ReplyDelete